Litigation Preparation Plan under New Electronic Evidence Rules: Key to Ensuring Corporate Compliance and Data Security

In recent years, as the importance of electronically stored information (ESI) in legal proceedings has increased significantly, U.S. Federal Rule 37(e) further standardizes the responsibilities and sanctions of enterprises in data retention. Since the new rules came into effect, American companies and legal practitioners have been deeply aware of the new challenges posed by the era of big data to electronic evidence management.

In the legal environment of 2024, businesses face greater pressure than ever to preserve ESI. Here are the core implications and best strategies for businesses and legal teams to deal with this rule.

---

The Evolution and Core Impact of Federal Rule 37(e)

The main goal of the rule

1. Unify federal standards

The new rules provide a clearer guidance framework for how to deal with ESI loss and related sanctions, avoiding the problem of different standards among courts in different regions.

2. Raising the threshold for sanctions

The new rules make it clear that the court will only apply extreme sanctions if the loss is “deliberate” and causes “irreparable damage.” This adjustment is intended to reduce unnecessary excessive preservation by companies.

Typical Case: Lessons from O'Berry v. Archer Daniels Midland

In this case, the court imposed severe sanctions on the defendant for failing to properly preserve critical data. The court ruled:

- Unreasonable preservation: The defendant only kept printouts and did not properly preserve the electronic data.

- The conduct was intentional: The court held that the defendant’s failure to take adequate steps to preserve the data was intentional and was intended to undermine the plaintiff’s evidence.

- Lack of Data Retention Policy: The defendants did not have a formal ESI retention policy in place, which was considered a major dereliction of duty.

Ultimately, the court imposed a mandatory adverse presumption order on the defendant, which directly affected the outcome of the case. This case clearly conveys the message that companies need to invest more resources and planning in data preservation.

---

Litigation Preparation in the Big Data Era: Challenges Facing Enterprises

1. Explosive growth of data volume

Modern enterprises generate a huge amount of data on a daily basis. From emails to collaboration platforms, cloud storage and real-time communication tools, all data may become potential evidence. This brings great challenges to data preservation and management.

2. Diversify data sources

- Cloud storage and decentralized platforms: Data is distributed across different vendors and devices, increasing management complexity.

- Global litigation needs: Multinational businesses need to meet data preservation and compliance requirements in different jurisdictions.

3. Compliance and regulatory risks

With the introduction of data protection regulations such as GDPR and CCPA, companies not only need to deal with litigation rules, but also need to ensure that data storage and transmission comply with international regulatory requirements.

---

Best Practices: How to Develop an Effective Litigation Preparation Plan?

1. Establish a comprehensive ESI preservation policy

Enterprises need to formulate clear ESI preservation policies to clarify the preservation period, methods and responsible persons for different types of data. For example:

- Establish a long-term preservation plan for key business data (such as contracts and transaction records).

- Establish a reasonable clearing process for non-core data (such as instant messaging records).

2. Use smart e-discovery technology

Through machine learning and predictive analysis, companies can automatically filter and tag potentially relevant data, reducing the cost and error rate of manual screening. For example:

- Dynamic Data Classification: Automatically classify and tag data based on context and usage.

- Real-time risk alerts: Provide notifications when data is about to expire or presents compliance risks.

3. Implement multilingual data management

In cross-border litigation, companies need to ensure that all data complies with the language and cultural requirements of the target jurisdiction. Professional multilingual translation and localization services can avoid compliance issues caused by language barriers.

4. Train your team and assess risks in advance

Through regular training and mock reviews, the legal and technical teams’ understanding of and ability to respond to electronic evidence rules are enhanced.

---

Technology Solutions for Litigation Preparation in 2024

1. Data protection and automation tools

Modern e-discovery platforms can automate data screening and classification while ensuring data is encrypted and protected during storage and transmission. For example:

- Real-time encryption: Protect sensitive data from unauthorized access.

- Permission management: Assign access rights based on roles to reduce the risk of data leakage.

2. Predictive analysis and intelligent review

Through AI-driven predictive analytics tools, companies can quickly identify key case-related data to optimize review efficiency.

3. Cloud-based and local storage solutions

For global enterprises, adopting a hybrid storage model (combining cloud and local storage) can more flexibly respond to compliance requirements in different jurisdictions.

---

Arrow Translation’s Litigation Preparation Solutions

As the world's leading provider of language services and data management, Arrow Translation provides comprehensive support to help companies achieve compliance and operate efficiently in complex legal environments.

1. Customized ESI preservation policy

Arrow Translation's team of experts helps enterprises design comprehensive ESI preservation and management strategies to ensure data preservation complies with regulatory requirements.

2. Intelligent electronic discovery platform

Through AI-driven e-discovery technology, we help customers automatically screen, classify and label potentially relevant data, significantly improving review efficiency.

3. Multi-language and localization services

For cross-border litigation needs, we provide professional legal translation and multi-language data management support to ensure that all documents meet international regulatory requirements.

4. Professional training and risk assessment

Regular regulatory update training and risk simulation reviews are provided to help clients cope with the ever-changing legal environment.

---

Summary: Be prepared for a complex legal environment

In the context of Federal Rule 37(e) and other international data protection regulations, an organization’s litigation preparedness has become a decisive competitive advantage. By developing intelligent ESI preservation policies, introducing advanced technology solutions, and collaborating with professional partners, organizations can achieve cost optimization and compliance assurance in a high-stakes legal environment.

To learn more about our litigation preparation solutions, visit Arrow Translation official website.

Arrow Translation: Helping you stay one step ahead in a complex global legal environment!

◀️：Technology-Assisted Review (TAR) in the English Courts: A Transnational Development Based on American Jurisprudence

▶️：The rise of legal operations positions: A key role in the transformation of the modern legal department